What happened?
Our group met early for the workshop, so we could start work on finishing the 2nd Assignment as soon as possible.
Over the course of what would be lecture time, we showed off ideas to each other in Blender and each collaborated in a group piece.
One group member had worked on an entire piece over the last week and showed me at the weekend, but they needed a music track, to which I provided them with.
In the workshop we continued to do the group artefact for the 2nd assignment, however we soon realised that it was not suitable for handing in (it was far too short) so we decided to hand in the work the single group member created over the previous week.
I'm annoyed that the group didn't learn Blender like we agreed, however I am happy that a group member put in the work to help the group pass.
I am also displeased that we did not get a suitable artefact created in the workshop. It may have helped if we had practised as a group many times beforehand, to make the process of making a single artefact influenced by many people be quicker.
Reasoning and thinking behind actions and practices...
I think the group was not enthusiastic about completing this assignment well because they had just focused on completing the essay, so this task seems like it doesn't need much effort for it to be completed.
Evaluation
Good: The group had an artefact to hand in for the 2nd assignment.
Bad: The group did not do what it agreed to do, the group did not make a proper collaborative artefact.
Reconstruction
All members must get on with practising what the group needs to do before the deadline week. I need to make sure group members are doing their part in the group. It would also help members if each one knew what the others were doing and didn't show the group their work until the last minute.
No comments:
Post a Comment